Crowdcheck Blog

Well, I already blogged about the zombies of the crowdfunding world, so let’s look at the vampires too. Those exploitive professionals and semi-professionals who seize on small companies desperate for capital and do nothing but suck the lifeblood from them, in terms of money, time and management focus, and deliver nothing. We are in the process of creating a “prohibited providers” list for one of our platform clients. Two other clients independently have each dubbed their own similar list the “creeps list.” OTC Markets publishes its prohibited service providers list, which is an admirable public service to everyone in this market. Who goes on a “creeps list”?…

Online securities platforms should be paying attention to the Lorenzo case, which the Supreme Court decided last month concerning the scope of Rule 10b-5 fraud liability. The case involved a broker who sent out a couple of emails at the direction of his boss. The boss created the content of the emails and approved them. All Mr. Lorenzo did, in effect, was add his name and press send. But he knew that there were misstatements in those emails. It’s already clear that anyone who makes a false statement (and there’s another Supreme Court case that explains what it means to “make” a statement that online platforms should be aware of) is liable under the anti-fraud…

April is coming, when Reg A filing companies must file their annual reports. And, as has happened in the past, some company will fail to get its 1-K filed in time.  The accountant was busy, the lawyers didn’t nag enough, the dog ate their filings . . . So what do you do when this happens to you and you have an ongoing offering under Reg A? Don’t panic. While you have failed to comply with the requirements of Reg A, there’s nothing bad that is going to happen to you on a permanent basis if you follow these rules: If you have an offering open, stop taking money. At 5.30 pm on April 30. If you take any money while you are not in compliance with the Reg A ongoing…

With the recent SEC proposal that would permit all companies, as opposed to just “emerging growth companies,” to talk to institutional investors prior to filing an offering with the SEC, we are heading towards more confusion with respect to what companies raising funds can say when. The confusion stems from the fact that the Securities Act of 1933 regulates both “offers” and sales of securities, and the term “offer” is very broadly defined.* When I used to teach securities law to new lawyers I used to joke that the mere statement “This is not an offer of securities” is in fact an offer of securities. The US is somewhat unique in its regulation of offers, in…

The ongoing government shutdown is hurting startups. Regulation A was amended in 2015 to give early-stage companies a way to raise funds from the general public, including online. While Reg A offerings are often referred to as “mini IPOs,” they really aren’t, for a number of reasons. IPOs are held when a company is ready to become a fully-registered company. They typically involve a cast of thousands, a long timeline, an extensive price discovery process and they generally aren’t held when the company is in desperate need of money. Reg A offerings, in contrast, are more usually used as an alternative to an angel or VC funding for startups, especially for…

I wrote this and posted it on my personal blog at the time of the Christmas 2012 Shutdown. Unfortunately, it seems just as relevant today. I am particularly struck by the reference to the Dow performance. Merry Christmas to all those who celebrate it. Sara [Date: many years in the future] Many memories have faded now.  But the clearest memories I have are of the events one Christmas that nobody quite agrees about.  All of us who were there know that something happened, but when we try to describe it, the facts and details slide through our minds and become insubstantial, inchoate.  Like things you see from the corner of your eye; when you turn, they aren’t…

Confucius had some thoughts on precision of language: Tsze-lu said, “The ruler of Wei has been waiting for you, in order with you to administer the government. What will you consider the first thing to be done?” The Master replied, “What is necessary is to rectify names.” “So! Indeed!” said Tsze-lu. “You are wide of the mark! Why must there be such rectification?” The Master said, “How uncultivated you are, Yu! A superior man, in regard to what he does not know, shows a cautious reserve. “If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to…

We’ve noticed something interesting recently: Regulation A filings by companies that used to be SEC-reporting companies with quotes on the OTC Pink market, who have ceased to file reports with the SEC and whose trading activity on OTC has flatlined. Why would such companies file for a Reg A offering? Especially since so many of them are complete losers with weird agglomerations of business lines resulting from multiple reverse mergers (“We are a holding company operating in the mattress, muffin and blockchain businesses”)? Because someone can make money, and it’s not the issuer and it’s not investors. Here’s how. You start with an existing OTC-quoted shell…

Part of the whole point of crowdfunding is that you leverage the “wisdom of the crowd.” That is, a start-up company presents the relevant information about its idea, its team, and its financials to the crowd, and the crowd weighs in with questions and commentary. The crowd may ask about the company’s competitors, challenge the valuation, ask for further information about the company’s plans and draw the company’s attention to issues management hadn’t thought about. Crowd comments have the ability to improve disclosure and increase the knowledge of potential investors. This is why the regulators insist on crowd communication channels being clear, and examine…

Well, actually nothing of the sort, but did I get your attention? The SEC is continuing to bring suit against ICO scammers. This one got my attention because (a) the scammers stuck the SEC seal on their website and tried to make out that they were a regulated entity and (b) said they could sell under Regulation A, when they hadn’t filed a Form 1-A with the SEC. Two things here: First, these are dumb criminals. If you can’t work out that the SEC really likes its seal and takes it terribly personally when people who are not the SEC plaster it all over their offerings, or that it takes two seconds for folks to work out whether or not an offering has been qualified…