CrowdCheck Blog
So May 2 marked the due date for most companies in the crowdfunding world to file their annual reports on Form 1-K or C-AR.
And many companies didn’t.
Do I need to remind you that in order to make an offering under either Reg A or Reg CF, if you have made offerings under that exemption before, you have to have made ALL ongoing reports required by the exemption in the previous two years before relying on that exemption again? Apparently I do.
Now for some companies, it’s possible to get back…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Crowdfunding Conditions, Federal Law, Regulation, Regulation A, Section 4(a)(6), Securities Law
So May 2 marked the due date for most companies in the crowdfunding world to file their annual reports on Form 1-K or C-AR.
And many companies didn’t.
Do I need to remind you that in order to make an offering under either Reg A or Reg CF, if you have made offerings under that exemption before, you have to have made ALL ongoing reports required by the exemption in the previous two years before relying on that exemption again? Apparently I do.
Now for some companies, it’s possible to get back…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Crowdfunding Conditions, Federal Law, Regulation, Regulation A, Section 4(a)(6), Securities Law
So May 2 marked the due date for most companies in the crowdfunding world to file their annual reports on Form 1-K or C-AR.
And many companies didn’t.
Do I need to remind you that in order to make an offering under either Reg A or Reg CF, if you have made offerings under that exemption before, you have to have made ALL ongoing reports required by the exemption in the previous two years before relying on that exemption again? Apparently I do.
Now for some companies, it’s possible to get back…
This entry is filed under Capital Raising, Crowdfunding, Crowdfunding Conditions, Federal Law, Regulation, Regulation A, Section 4(a)(6), Securities Law
One of the great benefits to issuers under the SEC’s rules for offerings under Tier 2 of Regulation A, effectively created by the JOBS Act, is the preemption of state requirements for registration of the offer and sale of securities. Known as “Blue Sky Laws”, these state specific rules added considerable cost to qualifying an offering under Regulation A.
The SEC determined it was appropriate to preempt state qualification rules by deeming securities offered and sold under Tier 2 of Regulation A…
This entry is filed under Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
One of the great benefits to issuers under the SEC’s rules for offerings under Tier 2 of Regulation A, effectively created by the JOBS Act, is the preemption of state requirements for registration of the offer and sale of securities. Known as “Blue Sky Laws”, these state specific rules added considerable cost to qualifying an offering under Regulation A.
The SEC determined it was appropriate to preempt state qualification rules by deeming securities offered and sold under Tier 2 of Regulation A…
This entry is filed under Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
One of the great benefits to issuers under the SEC’s rules for offerings under Tier 2 of Regulation A, effectively created by the JOBS Act, is the preemption of state requirements for registration of the offer and sale of securities. Known as “Blue Sky Laws”, these state specific rules added considerable cost to qualifying an offering under Regulation A.
The SEC determined it was appropriate to preempt state qualification rules by deeming securities offered and sold under Tier 2 of Regulation A…
This entry is filed under Regulation A, Securities Law, State Law
If you work with us, you will hear it many times that we strongly advise against financial projections … as they can get you in trouble. However, companies always seem to want to include projections that start from zero, and grow exponentially. This type of financial projection that is untethered to reality is a primary driver of what will cause investors to sue for being misled because investors expect companies to believe that those projected results are attainable.
One such commonly used…
This entry is filed under Disclosure, Fraud, SEC, Securities Law
If you work with us, you will hear it many times that we strongly advise against financial projections … as they can get you in trouble. However, companies always seem to want to include projections that start from zero, and grow exponentially. This type of financial projection that is untethered to reality is a primary driver of what will cause investors to sue for being misled because investors expect companies to believe that those projected results are attainable.
One such commonly used…
This entry is filed under Disclosure, Fraud, SEC, Securities Law
If you work with us, you will hear it many times that we strongly advise against financial projections … as they can get you in trouble. However, companies always seem to want to include projections that start from zero, and grow exponentially. This type of financial projection that is untethered to reality is a primary driver of what will cause investors to sue for being misled because investors expect companies to believe that those projected results are attainable.
One such commonly used…
This entry is filed under Disclosure, Fraud, SEC, Securities Law
If you work with us, you will hear it many times that we strongly advise against financial projections … as they can get you in trouble. However, companies always seem to want to include projections that start from zero, and grow exponentially. This type of financial projection that is untethered to reality is a primary driver of what will cause investors to sue for being misled because investors expect companies to believe that those projected results are attainable.
One such commonly used…
This entry is filed under Disclosure, Fraud, SEC, Securities Law